As I mentioned last week
, I went to the Washington Post's "First Ever DC Blogger Summit"
last night. (Obligatory "dumb things" content: I got there an hour late, partially because I got a late exit, and I forgot how much I-66 eastbound sucks at rush hour -- not to be confused with I-66
, who was also there and does not suck -- and I also neglected to write down the cross street.) So I got there at 7pm, during the break after the first session (a panel of Post bloggers):
The audience was very male, surprisingly so. The word "sausagefest" comes to mind.Blogging and Libel Law
The second session was a "meet a real-life lawyer"-style presentation on blogging and the law. (I don't have his name, since I didn't grab a packet). It was informative, insightful, and as these legal presentations usually do, simultaneously sucked the air out of the room and scared the hell out of people.
I've participated in a bunch of presentations on legal issues on blogging and social media, so I do know that people do get sued (even people who aren't, say, Perez Hilton
) and that there are real pitfalls and liabilities, and that people should watch what they say.
However, I thought that the session, which focused on defamation and libel
, was not as well suited to this audience, especially since locally-based bloggers on national political topics had been specifically asked not
For those of us who aren't political reporters, more stuff on copyright infringement, the much abused concept of "fair use" (see the fair use comic book
), dealing with frivolous DMCA claims, and where to get photos that aren't , you know, stolen, would have been useful.Blast from the past:
Remember the Communications Decency Act
? The parts that were upheld are a good thing, since that's where safe harbor provisions
for ISPs come from. (Thank you, pandering to telecom corporate interests!)
Questions asked and answered included:
- Factual Predicates --> Ridiculous Conclusions = Okay!
- Blogging about material obtained from the public record = Fine (but hallway discussions don't count)
- Comments posted to your blog are probably covered under safe harbor, and you don't have to verify that Jesus@heaven.org is a real e-mail address (but don't go sourcing Him with abandon)
- If you photoshop satirical photos where you mess with celeb pics: -- don't be too subtle (i.e. do a crappy job), asked by Listen to Leon
- Paraphrasing the lawyer: If I were going to blog myself, I'd get libel insurance. (I love it when non-bloggers explain how to blog. And when I say "love," I mean "hate." And there's libel insurance?)
- See Libel resources for bloggers, including EFF, and I think MLRC and RCFP
- A really naive question (sorry, it was) about using your employer's name to give yourself credibility, yet trying to cover yourself with the standard "opinions expressed are my own" disclaimer... go talk to HR
- Saying "But everybody else is doing it!" "gives you co-defendants, not cover"
There was also a plug for his book on legal issues for reporters, which he apologized was pricey -- I was going to say, it's okay, we'll scan it and put it online, which would have been both snark and a comment on the lack of more discussion on IP, copyright and fair use issues. But I didn't.Random Observation:
Condo Boards and Loudoun County land use folks play hardball.The Local Blog Directory
The final session covered the Local Blog Directory that the Post is putting together, as well as some associated advertising strategies. It was led by Jonathan Krim and Jeff Burkett
As a social media professional (such as I am), it was gratifying to see that everyone is dealing with the same issues and asks the same questions:
- Folksonomy vs. rigid taxonomy
- What to do about profanity (e.g. blog tagline: "I piss excellence!", which I later saw was a Talladega Nights quote)
- How to surface relevant blog content in other areas, and how to emphasize relevant content during interest spikes
- How are people going to get to the silly thing?
- Categorizing blogs/entries that span multiple categories (or none)
- What other visualization methods are useful (e.g. tag clouds)
- The balance between human intervention and automation
- Granularity, especially in geotagging -- how much is too much?
- Related -- how to handle the "general" blogs, and bloggers who live in a neighborhood, but don't have a "neighborhood" blog
- Interest Matching/Customization vs. Serendipity
- Using social voting (a la digg)?
- Abstracts: How much information to expose? Summaries are useful, but costly (in terms of screen real estate)
- Resources for participating bloggers: Widgets? Knowledge sharing? More?
- Submitting and exposing photos (a la the dcist Flickr tag)
- Oh yeah: All the monetization aspects.
Like I said, the same problems and the same questions.
Here's a photo of the Local Blog Directory mockup:
Tip: Use English, not Greek. (Oh, I slay myself.)
Some additional comments:
The Social Portion
- Easy to miss (even if it is on the home page), but they do have a sponsored blogroll (under the banner of WPNI) -- they're trying to see if the model is extensible to the local level; see their blog for more info.
- They name-checked DCBlogs (go Pat!)
Afterwards, we decamped for the Post Pub
; I didn't get very many pictures
, but between the event and the bar portion of the evening, other bloggers I encountered included DCist's Sommer Mathis
, Celeste Dawn Mitchell
, Miss Chatter
(sporting very pink hair), Hey Pretty
and a metric shitload
(oops, darn that profanity) of Metblogs DC
folks; Rob Goodspeed
, plus a bunch of Posties (they love it when you call them that), including Jim Brady (who hasn't been in the middle of blog dustup in, months
now) and entourage.
Also, a special hello to Mike Grass
, the Express dude who I'd been giving a moderately hard time via a few comments to a recent entry where he'd complained about VA drivers
on the trip back from Michigan. He seems like a nice guy... even if he was the one who mistook me for a girl
in a local blog log
item a while back -- I hadn't realized he was the one until he owned up.
Overall, I think it was a useful event, and I like to see if these continue as the Post gets closer to rolling out their directory. Metblogs DC wins the DC group blog attendance award. It's a good thing I brought enough business cards, since that's what I was taking notes on.
Finally, you still can't say "Man Ass"
in the Washington Post (but you can say "Manassas.") I don't know what means in this context, but that's just the wacky, irreverent, spontaneous content that makes blogs so... bloggy. Can't you feel the decline in readership and subscribers reversing as we speak?