Now, though, when you try to submit an NYT link to Fark, it fails -- you get an error:
The error message says it's a 302 temporary redirect, though Redirect Checker says it a 301 permanent redirect. Either way, Fark doesn't like it.
I'm not 100% on the timing, but I think it's related to changes that were made when NYT rolled out their TimesPeople social network a few months back. (I already disliked TimesPeople because it adds a persistant Javascript tool bar at the top of the page -- when you page down in an article, it cuts off the first few lines, so you have to scroll back up to pick up where you left off. It's annoying.)
Anyway, that's probably why there haven't been any NYT links on Fark the last few months. (Other social booksharing sites seem unaffected.)
I guess an alternate interpretation would be that Fark doesn't want any NYT links. But the headline on that doesn't sound as cool.
Tags:
No comments:
Post a Comment